Knowlton and Dominguez v. State

Appellants were indicted for assault with intent to murder. When tried they were convicted of aggravated assault. They entered into no recognizance. Instead they gave appeal bonds. *Page 9 The State moves to dismiss the appeal because no recognizance was entered into. Under the statute and decisions the motion must be sustained. C.C.P., arts. 918 and 920; Wells v. State,68 Tex. Crim. 276, 150 S.W. Rep., 899; Hamilton v. State,68 Tex. Crim. 47, 150 S.W. Rep., 775. The appeal is dismissed. Dismissed. ADDITIONAL OPINION. June 17, 1914.