Donahue v. Fuller

COBBS, J. Defendant in error sued plaintiff in error for the sum of $250, stipulated commission for bringing about the exchange of lands as provided in a -written contract. W. W. Bueche, one of the parties to the contract was not sued. Plaintiff in error answered, among other things, that the title was not good, setting out certain defects in the title, and the existence of a valid unreleased lien thereon, which caused the refusal of Donahue to perform. The cause was tried with a jury, and at the close of the evidence both parties made requests for an instructed verdict, and the court instructed a verdict in favor of defendant in error for $250, for which sum the court entered judgment. Appellee had negotiations with W. W. Bueche and brought him and appellant together and the following contract was negotiated by and between them: “State of Texas, County of Bexar. “This contract witnesseth: That W. W. Bueche, of Frio county, Texas, and H. J. Donahue, of Bexar county, Texas, agree to exchange with each other their real properties, as fol•lows: “W. W. Bueche agrees, obligates and binds himself to sell, alien and convey to H. J. Donahue,, of Bexar county, Texas, by valid warranty deed, two hundred and nine (209) acres of land, situated six and one-half miles east of Pearsall, in Frio county, Texas, valued at seven thousand dollars, and described as follows: “In consideration of which, H. J. Donahue obligates and binds himself to sell, alien and convey to W. W. Bueche by valid warranty deed and title lots Nos. thirteen (13) and fourteen (14) in block two (2), city block 3886, situated in the city of San Antonio, Bexar county, Texas, valued at seven thousand ($7,000.00) dollars. W. W. Bueche is to clear the title to said 209 acres of all liens thereon, and in particular of a lien for two thousand ($2,000.00) dollars, and to convey said land to said Donahue *1038 free from all incumbránces or taxes; the parties hereto to have their abstracts of title brought up to date, showing valid and merchantable title to their properties, or if defective, to be made marketable as early as it is possible to do so. The deal to be closed on or before fifteen days after delivery of abstracts of title; each party to furnish certificate showing payment of all back taxes upon their respective properties. “It is agreed that H. J.' Donahue shall pay to J. P. Puller, agent, two hundred and fifty ($250.-00) dollars, as commissions for negotiating this deal. “All city, state and county taxes upon the lots of H. J. Donahue to be paid, and all state and county taxes due upon the 200 acres of land to be paid. “It is stipulated and agreed that lots Nos. 13' and 14, in block 2, city block 3886, are to be conveyed together with all improvements thereon situated, including all furniture in the building located on said lots. “Witness our hands at San Antonio, Texas, this the 6th day of January, A. D. 1927. “H. J. Donahue. . “Walter W. Bueehe.” The contract specifically provided that W. W. Bueehe was to clear the title of said 209 acres of certain liens and to have abstracts brought down to date “showing valid merchantable-title to their properties, and if defective, to be made marketable as early as it is possible to do so. The deal to be closed fifteen days after delivery of abstracts, etc.” The stipulation as to commission was $250 for only “negotiating this deal.” The abstract of title furnished was examined by plaintiff in error’s attorney and upon whose advice it was turned down as not a good and merchantable title, such as contracted for. ' It was no fault of the broker that W. W. Bueehe did not comply with the terms of the contract and within a reasonable time clear up the title. The facts show that Bueehe failed to clear the title to his 209 acres of land of all liens and to convey said land free from all incum-brances. The exchange was not consummated though appellee made all the negotiations for the exchange. In the contract for exchange it was stipulated, among other things: “It is agreed that H. J. Donahue shall pay to J. P. Puller, agent, two hundred and fifty ($250'.-00) dollars, as commissions for negotiating this deal.” This was probably done to satisfy Bueehe that appellant considered himself bound for the commissions, but it was an admission upon the part of appellant that he owed appel-lee $250, not for the consummation, but for “negotiating this deal.” At the time that the contract was made 'the negotiations made by appellee were closed, and he could not extend his negotiations any further. His service was at an end, and for that service appellant promised unconditionally to pay appellee $250. That admission of indebtedness was not conditioned upon the consummation of the exchange of the properties and the mutual execution of deeds, but the payment was to be made for negotiations already performed which had ended in a contract of exchange, capable of being enforced at law. There is a very broad distinction between making or causing a sale to be made and negotiating a sale. In the latter case it means to discuss or arrange a sale or bargain; to arrange the preliminaries of a business transaction ; the deliberation, discussion, or conference upon the terms of a proposed agreement; the act of settling or arranging the terms and conditions of a bargain, sale, or. other business transaction. Black’s Daw Dictionary. The negotiations may never terminate in a sale. A feale is a contract by which for a consideration one party transfers to another an interest in property. It is an agreement by which one gives a thing for a price in current money and the other gives the price in order to have the thing itself. In other words, these are the circumstances to concur to the perfection of the contract: The thing sold, the price paid, and the consent. Black’s Daw Dictionary. If an agent therefore is employed’ simply to make a sale, it is necessary in such case for the sale to be actually consummated' to earn his commission; but, where the agent is only required to negotiate a sale to earn his commission, his commission is dependent-on the performance of that obligation, to the-satisfaction of his principal, whether the sale is actually completed or not. We think the broker earned his commission, and the trial court committed no error in the judgment, and it is affirmed. The original opinion is withdrawn and this-substituted in lieu thereof.