Steger v. May

WALTHALL, J. This action was brought in the county court of El Paso county by E. P. May against V. Steger to recover the sum of $500, alleged to have been sustained by him for the alleged breach of contract to inspect and buy certain horses and mules, and expenses incident to gathering same, time lost, etc. No answer was filed by Steger. Judgment by default was rendered for May, for $335. Plaintiff in error assigns error in the court’s rendering judgment in any sum, there being no service of citation upon him, and no acceptance or waiver of service or appearance. While the judgment rendered recites that plaintiff in error, “though duly cited, having failed to appear and answer in this behalf, but wholly made default,” etc., the record does not otherwise show service of citation, waiver, or appearance. Article *990 2109, Vernon's Sayles’ Texas Civ. Statutes, prescribes that the transcript shall, except as provided, contain a full and correct copy of all the proceedings had in the case. Article 2110, Vernon’s Sayles’, provides that, if the pleadings or judgment show an appearance of the defendant in person or by an attorney, the citation and returns shall not be copied into the transcript. The record shows no agreement to omit the copying of the citation in the transcript. Where the record on appeal shows no citation to defendant, waiver, or appearance, it fails to show that the trial court had jurisdiction. Palomas Hand & Cattle Co. v. Good et al., 184 S. W. 805, and cases there cited; Daugherty v. Powell, 139 S. W. 625. Eor reasons stated, the case is reversed and remanded. Footnotes [1] <@^For other cases see same topic ana KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes