Full text
Minnie Chambers v. the State

Loading…
Opinion
149 Tex. Crim. 400 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 8, 1946
Full text
Minnie Chambers v. the State
Cited by
Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas) · Jul 21, 2022
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Jul 1, 2021
Texas Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2019
Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana) · Apr 26, 2019
Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 20, 2015
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 2014
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Mar 21, 2013
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Mar 21, 2013
Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston) · Oct 16, 2012
Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist. · Aug 31, 2006
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Jun 3, 2003
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Nov 6, 2002
Parentheticals
holding that appellate court would not consider ex parte documents that were not filed in the trial court
holding that appellate court would not consider ex parte documents that were not filed in the trial court
holding documents that "have neither been filed nor introduced upon the trial ... cannot [be] consider[ed] ... as part of this record"
Baylor Scott and White, Hillcrest Medical Center v. Ruthen James Weems Iii
holding documents that “have neither been filed nor introduced upon the trial . . . cannot [be] consider[ed] . . . as part of this record”
Ruthen James Weems III v. Baylor, Scott & White, Hillcrest Medical Center