Full text
Dustin Wilson v. Lieutenant Tincher
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6559
DUSTIN C. WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT TINCHER; SERGEANT LUNDY; WARDEN WRIGHT; GRIEVANCE COUNSELOR WALLS; NURSE PAYNE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00134-NKM-RSB)
Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dustin Chase Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:
Dustin C. Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting one defendant’s motion to dismiss and granting in part and denying in part the remaining defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Wilson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Robinson v. Parke-Davis & Co., 685 F.2d 912, 913 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.