Matter of Chao v. Hollingshead

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a prison disciplinary determination. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. Although petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, including reinstatement to his prison job and back pay, “inmates have no constitutional or statutory right to their prior housing or programming status” (Matter of Hamilton v Bezio, 93 AD3d 1049, 1050 [2012]; see Matter of Folk v Annucci, 122 AD3d 977, 978 [2014]). Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Hill v Annucci, 136 AD3d 1081, 1082 [2016]; Matter of Folk v Annucci, 122 AD3d at 978). Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.