Noble, Reginald Arliegh

U ____________________._.._=_____:________£_“_____,_.___£_____»_,~. momm-wo_‘mw .X._. _O._.__m<_>_< _ _‘mm xDam room wwmm_.©_. #OO._. - ._._ZD m._.Zm_>_m¢_O mImOZ IOm__.E< G._<Z_Gm_m ,. §§ _Bwoo< _B< \N\ T % _ nw _t:oo w£ 2 n£cmwm§ Ucm owion cmmg wmc w:Emocm&-who…W@.MM£&….,I%MQ_Qam _mc_m:o m£ _>mu w_£ cO mwoom".d§>g…@ ‘,M_,.H..M ,..; om_._m< n_._<z_om_~_ .w._moz mvoN\oN\_‘_. Fm- _‘vm.mm-m>> . mmD mw<>_m& k COL \C..“<Zma v 3 w<th. LO mP<Fm mg@@_)x@m.§§©lw© ws§§§§h s d .. §§ YBMNDMHRW N..*.Ur.. rv.w. ..v§. , md G .. .,V_§az~..»zo;<§ 5@@< mw§m §§ A$@<EQ[._ QE$WM . w<Xm:L LO m\~<maa< ~._<Z:>:MU LO ,_.MDOO §OME m.U:lOZ 1_<._0;-@ .RECE|VED l couR-T oF chM)NAL-A§PEALS \ DEC 2129@5 AbeSAcosta, Clerk Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 23, 2015 ln The Court of Appeals Iiifih Dioir_ict of Texas at Dalla§ No. 05-15-01366:i:v ' IN RE REGINALD A. NOBLE, Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-0050025-K MEMORANDUM OPlNlON Bef`ore'Justices Francis, Myers`, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Francis Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the trial court failed to comply with its statutory duties in-connection with his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We lack jurisdiction over the petition This Court has not been given general supervisory control over district and county courts. Texas Emp Ihs Ass' n v Kirby, 150 S. W. 2d 123, 126 (Tex. Civ. App._Dallas 1941, no writ). While the courts of appeals have concurrent- mandam_us`-~- jurisdictionlwith the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in post-conviction proceedings in which il this Court has appellate jurisdiction over the trial court’s ruling, see é.g., Padz'lla v. McDaniel, 122 S.W.3d 805, 808 (Tex. Crini. App. 2003) (forensic DNA testing), the Court has no jurisdiction in post- -conviction habeas corpus proceedings brought under article 11. 07 of the Texas Code ofCriminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015);1n re McAfee, 53 S.W.Sd 715, 717 (Tex. App.-¥Houston [15t Dist.] 2001,' orig. proceeding). “Article 11.07 contains no role for the courts of-` appeals; the only courts referred to are the convicting court and the Court of Criminal Appeals.” 111 re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d at 718. Consequently, any complaints about action or inaction on a matter related to a post-conviction petition for writ of habeas corpus must be brought by mandamus to the Texa's Court of Criminal Appeals and notto this Court. In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d at 717. l We dismiss the petition for want ofjurisdiction. 1'513661~`.1>05 /Molly Francis/ MoLLY FRANCIS JusTICE Order entered November 23, 2015 In 'I`he Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas \No. 05-15-01366~CV IN RE REGINALD A. NOBLE, Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-0050025-K ORDER Before Justices Francis, Myers and Schenck ,Based. on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus. Although we have considered relator’s petition without the prepayment of costs, we DENY as moot relator’s motion for leave to file his affidavit of indigence. We DENY as unnecessary relator’s motion for leave to file his petition for writ of mandamus We ORDER relator to bear the costs ofthis original proceeding /s/ , MoLLY FRANCIS ` JusTICE