Full text
COBB, ROOSEVELT v. SHEAHAN, MICHAEL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
[1245] CA 14-00431 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF ROOSEVELT COBB,
PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MICHAEL SHEAHAN, SUPERINTENDENT, FIVE POINTS
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
ROOSEVELT COBB, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF
COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Seneca County (Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), entered December 26, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment denied and dismissed the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition challenging his sentence as calculated by the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, we conclude that DOCCS correctly computed his sentence and, thus, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition (see generally Matter of Williams v Annucci, 131 AD3d 1329, 1330-1331 ). To the extent that petitioner contends that he was denied the benefit of his plea bargain, his remedy is to seek relief by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 (see Matter of Cristostomo v Fischer, 93 AD3d 976, 977 ).
Entered: December 31, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
