Full text
COWELL, MICHELE v. PEMBROCK, SR., ROBERT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
[1350] CAF 12-01236 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF MICHELE COWELL,
PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROBERT PEMBROCK, SR., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
ELIZABETH CIAMBRONE, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
VENZON LAW FIRM PC, BUFFALO (CATHARINE M. VENZON OF COUNSEL), FOR
RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
DOMINIC PAUL CANDINO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret O. Szczur, J.), entered May 14, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, dismissed the petition seeking to modify a prior order that awarded custody of the subject child to respondent.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner mother appeals from an order that, inter alia, dismissed her petition seeking modification of a prior order that awarded custody of the subject child to respondent father. Contrary to the mother’s contention, Family Court properly dismissed the petition following a hearing. In seeking a change in the established custody arrangement, the mother was required to show “ ‘a change in circumstances [that] reflects a real need for change to ensure the best interest[s] of the child’ ” (Matter of Moore v Moore,
78 AD3d 1630, 1630 , lv denied 16 NY3d 704 ), and the record supports the court’s conclusion that the mother failed to make that showing (see Matter of Horn v Horn, 74 AD3d 1848, 1848 , lv denied 15 NY3d 710 ).
Entered: January 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
