SHIELDS, MICHAEL L.T. v. TOWERY, CRYSTAL

*1344 Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, respondent mother appeals from an order denying her objection to the order of the Support Magistrate that modified a prior order by, inter alia, reducing the weekly child support obligation of petitioner father and his share of child care and unreimbursed health-related expenses. We affirm. The father presented evidence that his income from employment decreased as the result of an involuntary reduction in his overtime hours. The Support Magistrate’s determination that his loss of income was sufficiently substantial to warrant a downward modification of his child support obligation is entitled to great deference (see generally Matter of Manocchio v Manocchio, 16 AD3d 1126, 1128 [2005]). Contrary to the mother’s contention, moreover, the Support Magistrate properly exercised her discretion in concluding that the amount of rental income calculated at the time of the prior order constituted the most reliable amount to be imputed to the father for purposes of the instant proceeding (see Matter of Niagara County Dept. of Social Servs. v Hueber, 89 AD3d 1440 [2011]; see generally Matter of Gravenese v Marchese, 57 AD3d 992, 993 [2008]). Present— Scudder, PJ., Smith, Sconiers, Gorski and Martoche, JJ.