United States v. Jamie Smith

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jamie Earl Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. While Smith’s appeal was pending, he completed his term of imprisonment and was released from prison. “Given [appellant’s] release from prison, there is no wrong to remedy and an appeal should be dismissed when, by virtue of an intervening event, a court of appeals cannot grant any effectual relief whatever in favor of the appellant.” United States v. Hardy, 545 F.3d 280, 285 (4th Cir. 2008) (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted); United States v. Booker, 645 F.3d 328 (5th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (explaining that “[a]ny termination of supervised release must be sought by a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1)”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED