Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. .

%-HE ,aTJ?ORNEY GENERAL

OF EXAS

April 20, 1959

Hon. R. H. Cory, Chairman Opinion No. WW-599 State Affairs Committee House of Representatives Re: Constitutionality of The State of Texas House Bill 102, 56th Austin, Texas Leg., The Texas Area Planning Act. Dear Mr. Gory: We quote from your opinion request as follows: "As chairman of the State Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives, and in accordance with a motion of such committee duly made and passed on Monday evening, March 2nd, I am send- ing to your office House Bill 102 by Eckhardt, with a request that you favor us with an opinion as to the constitutionality of such bill. The motion passed in the committee authorized this action and in particular called your attention to the tax features and the voting features with respect to the different number of votes needed in incorporated and unincorporated areas." As we interpret your request, we are called upon to give our opinion as to the constitutionality of the follow- ing features of House Bill 102: (1) authorization of the creation of Joint Planning Areas and the establishment of Area Planning Commissions; (2) Voting requirements for elections to establish Joint Planning Areas; and (3) author- ization of an ad valorem tax levy within a Joint Planning Areas. ESTABLISHMENT OF AREA PLANNING COMMISSION The legislative department may exercise all legislative power not expressly or by implication withheld byethe State Constitution or the Constitution of the United States; if there is anv doubt as to the validity of a law the action of the Legislature should be upheld. Brown v. City of Galveston, ' Tex. 1, 75 S.W. 488 (1903). Nothingin the Constitution of the State of Texas nor in the Constitution of the United States prohibits the Legislature from authorizing the creation of Joint Planning Areas and the establishment of Area Planning Commissions.

, . Hon. R. H. Cory, Chairman, Page 2 (Opinion No. 599)

VOTING REQUIREMENTS Section 3 of House Bill 102, provides that before a Joint Planning Area may be established, the question must be sub- mitted to the property tax paying voters within the county or counties affected. Article VI, Section 2, of the Texas Constitution pre- scribes the general voting requirements of electors, Under this Article any person shall be deemed a qualified elector who (1) shall have attained the age of twenty-one years; (2) is a citizen of the United States; (3) shall have resided in Texas one year next preceeding an election; and (4) have re- sided within the district or county in which he offers to vote six months immediately preceeding the time of holding the elec- tion. Article VI, Section 3a, provides that when an election is held by any county, or any number of counties, or any political subdivision of the State, or any political subdivi- sion of the county, or any other defined district within the State, for the purpose of issuing bonds or otherwise lending credit or expending money or assuming any debt, only qualified electors who own taxable property in the State, county, polit- ical subdivision, district, city, town or village where such election is held, and who shall have duly rendered the same for taxation, shall be permitted to vote. An election to es- tablish a Joint Planning Area does not involve issuance of bonds, lending- of credit, expending of money, or the assumotion Carlton Independent School District,-295 "s'Wde~"d*408Se7T~ 195b); and O'Brien v. Snelson, 82 S.W. 2d 679 (Tex.Civ.App. 1935). The Legislature is without power to restrict or extend the constitutional qualifications of legal voters. Texas Power and Light Co. v. Brownwood Public Service Co., 111 S W 2d 1223 (T Cl A 1937 erroFr?); Ramsay v. Wilhelm,'52 S.W. 2d 75~XiTe~:C!~:App. i932, error rer.); se als Attorney General's Opinion No. ~-16 There- fore, to Ehe eztent Section 3 of H. B. 102 prescribes voting qualifications in addition to the requirements of Article Vi, Section 2, it is unconstitutional. VALIDITY OF TAX LEYY WITHIN JOINT PLANNING AREA Subsections (2) and (3) of Section 8 of H. B. 102 provide as follows: "(2) In the event that the Area Planning Commission shall deem it in the interests of the Area, it may recommend that funds be raised from ad valorem tax levies to meet the financial requirements for financ- ing the Area Planning Commission and its activities. In such event it shall submit to the property~tax

. .

Hon. R. H. Cory, Chairman, Page 3 (Opinion No. 599)

paying voters within every county encompassed or partly encompassed within the Area the question of whether the said commission and its program be supported by a levy fixed by the commission not exceeding five cents ($.05) on each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation of all tax- able property in the area, or such maximum may be a smaller figure if the commission shall deem such advisable. "(3) In the event that said tax paying voters of the county or counties affected approve the said levy, then, after adoption of the budget by the commission each year, and not later than July 1, the commission may put into effect the following procedure, and only in such event shall the said levy of ad valorem taxes be applicable: "(a) The secretary of the commission shall cer- tify to the Commission's court of each county within the Joint Planning Area, the counties share of such tax, which shall be an amount bearing the same pro- portion to the total levy, fixed by the commission as the assessed valuation of the county bears to the assessed valuation of the Joint Planning Area. "(b) The maximum amount of any levy made for the purposes of this Act shall not exceed five cents ($.05) on each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation of all taxable property~,or any lesser maximum figure which the commission may have submitted for voter approval. "(c) The Commissioner's court of each county in a Joint Planning Area shall add the amount of any levy made by the commission to other tax levies of the county for collection by the county tax assessor and collector and shall fix the tax rate necessary therefor. "(d) The maximum amount of any levy made for the urposes of this Act shall not exceed five cents 7 8.05) on each one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed valuation of all taxable property, or any lesser maximum figure which the commission may have submitted for voter approval. "(e) When collected, the county shall make settle- ment of such taxes with the commission in the same

Hon. R. H. Cory, Chairman; Page 4 (Opinion No. WW-599)

manner as other taxes are distributed to political subdivisions. "(f) The levy authorized herein shall be in addition to any other county taxes authorized by law." The foregoing provisions authorize an Area Planning Commis- sion, after approval by the property tax paying voters, to make an ad valorem tax levy. The Texas Constitution of 1876 recognized only three entities which could collect taxes and expend public money: State, counties, cities and towns. See interpretive commen- tary under Article XVI, Section 59, of Texas Annotated Con- stitution. The Constitution has now extended the power of taxation to school districts (Article VII, Sections 3, 3a), fire prevention districts (Article III, Section 48-d), con- servation and reclamation districts (Article XVI, Section 59) and districts falling within the purview of Article III, Section 52. The Legislature is not authorized to grant the power of taxation to a research and advisory body such as an Area Planning Commission. In this regard see the case of Bexar--Medina--Atascosa Counties Water Improvement District Ember -- 1 v. State, 21 S W 2d 747, (Tex.Civ.App. lgresr ref.).more hoid'that H. B. 102 is inoperative in so far as it authorizes a tax levy by an Area Planning Commission. Although we believe the foregoing to be the correct construction of the above quoted provisions, another con- struction is possible, I.e. that the county concerned is directed to levy an ad valorem tax not to exceed five cents ($.05) per one hundred dollar ($100) valuation pursuant to the recommendation of an Area Planning Commission and after approval by the property tax paying voters in such county. Such a levy would'be within a county's power to tax for general administrative purposes and would be valid provided it did not exceed the maximum tax rate prescribed in Arti- cle VIII, Section 9, of the Texas Constitution. However, Subsection (3)(f) of Section 8 of H. B. 102 states that the levy authorized shall be in addition to any other county taxes authorized by law; therefore, even under this con- struction, a Constitutional amendment would be required in order to authorize the assessment and collection of the tax. See Attorney General's Opinion No. 0-5842.

. .

Hon. R. H. Cory, Chairman, Page 5 (Opinion No. WW-599)

SUMMARY The Legislature may establish a Joint Planning Area Commission for the purposes enumerated in House Bill 102. The voting requirements for establishing a Joint Plan- ning Area are void to the estent that addi- tional qualifications are imposed on legal voters in excess to Article VI, Section 2, of the Texas Constitution. The Legisla- ture cannot delegate to the Joint Area Planning Commission the power to levy a tax unless specifically authorized to do so by the Constitution; the Legislature cannot direct a tax levy byea county in excess to the maximum tax allowable of such county under the Texas Constitution.

WILL WILSON Attorney General

mm Assistant

JNP:bct APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE: Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman C. K. Richards John Reeves Fred Werkenthin REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: W. V. Geppert