Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN ORoVrR SCLLCRS ATrolMrv QCNRAL

Honorable I. M. Trimble, First Assistant State Superintendentof Public Xnstruction Austin, Texas Dear Sir: opinion Ro. o-7360 Re: Taxation and bon

From the correspond of August 16,~1946, It app tiorthhas acquired land fo geographical bo ndent School District. The red whether he City of Fort Id responsible for f the district. e questions we enclose in vhich the County rised that an air port vaa exempt from taxation in the land purchased for n addition to the cases cited on,*your attention ir invited to the the same subject: Corporation of San State, 111 Tex. 108, 229 S. U. 845; S. i. v. City of Bryan, I.43 ter. 348, 184 L. C. B. A. T. Chemical Bank and Tru8t Co. (Sup. Ct.) 160 S. W. 2d 48; Davis,v'.Burnett, 77 Tex. 3, 13 S. Y. 613; Daugherty V. Thortipcron, 71 Tex. 192, 9 S. Y. 99.

Honorable T. hi.Trlmble, Pago 2

The l aquimiblon of the property within !?avermn Tnd-rndont School District would not render the City of -“..-c-- I lart - wth reeponsible for any portion of the echo01 die -_-_ UC triat indebtednem, save only to the extent that .the property acquired might be subject to taxel if used by the City for other than public purpoeee. 1 Yours very truly I

-w Gaynor Kendall Asaiet?.nt

Encloeurr

.