United States v. Mario Johnson

PER CURIAM. Mario Johnson directly appeals after the district court 1 revoked his' supervised release and sentenced him to a within-guidelines prison term plus supervised release with special conditions. His counsel has filed a brief arguing that the district court plainly erred in imposing special conditions of supervised release related to treatment *803 programs. In addition, his counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not plainly err in imposing the special conditions of supervised release. See United States v. Wisecarver, 644 F.3d 764, 775 (8th Cir. 2011) (explaining that unobjected-to special conditions of supervised release are reviewed for plain error); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) (providing that special release conditions must be reasonably related to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and must involve no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary to advance § 3553(a) purposes). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm. Footnotes [1] The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.