Acuna v. Tildon-Burton

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SARAH GRAYCE NORRIS ACUNA and JAVIER ACUNA, Individually and As next friends and Guardians Ad Litem to JULIA GRAYCE ACUNA, An Infant Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. C.A. NO.: N17C-09-224 AML JANICE E. TILDGN-BURTON, M.D., Individually; JANICE TILDON-BURTON, M.D., P.A., a Delaware Corporation; And CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, JURY TRIAL OF 12 DEMANDED \./\./\./\/\./\./\/\./\/\/\./\./\/\/\./V\./\./\/\/ Defendants. Submitted: November 27, 2017 Decided: December 1, 2017 ORDER Upon Review of the Affidavit of Merit - Accepted On November 22, 2017, Defendant Janice E. Tildon-Burton, M.D., and Janice Tildon-Burton, M.D., P.A. moved to have the Court review Plaintiffs’ affidavit of merit, in camera, to determine Whether it complies With 18 Del. C. § 6853(a)(1) and (C)~l 1 18 Del. C. § 6853(d). On November 27, 2017, Defendant Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. (“CCHS”) moved to have the Court review Plaintiff`s’ affidavit of merit, in camera, to determine whether it complies with 18 Del. C. § 6853(a)(1) and (c). Specifically, CCHS asked the Court to determine whether the affidavit of merit gives an opinion that there has been healthcare medical negligence by each defendant, including CCHS’s agents, servants and employees CCHS also asked the Court to determine whether the affidavit of merit gives an opinion that each breach by each defendant, including CCHS’s agents, servants, and employees, proximately caused the injuries alleged in the complaint In Delaware, a healthcare negligence lawsuit must be filed with an affidavit of merit, signed by an expert, and accompanied by the expert’s current curriculum vitae.2 The expert must be licensed to practice medicine as of the affidavit’s date and engaged in the same or similar field as the defendant in the three years immediately preceding the alleged negligence3 The affidavit must state that reasonable grounds exist to believe the defendant was negligent in a way that proximately caused the plaintiffs injury.4 The statute’s requirements are minimal. 2 1a § 6853(3)(1). 3 ld. § 6853(¢). 4 ld. Accordingly, an affidavit of merit tracking the statutory language complies with the statute.5 After m camera review, the Court finds: l. 2. An expert signed the affidavit; The affidavit was accompanied by a current curriculum vitae; The expert is Board certified in Obstetrics & Gynecology and MaternalFetal Medicine; At the time the affidavit was sworn, the expert was engaged in the teaching/academic side of medicine in the same field of medicine as Defendants Janice E. Tildon-Burton, M.D. and CCHS, within the three years preceding the alleged negligence; The affidavit states that there are reasonable grounds to believe the applicable standard of care was breached by each Defendant, including Janice E. Tildon-Burton, M.D. and agents, servants, and employees of CCHS; and The expert states breaches of the standard of care proximately caused Julia Grayce Acuna to be born dead. 5 See Dz`shmon v. Fucci, 32 A.3d 338, 342 (Del. 2011) (“In order to satisfy the prima facie burden, an Affidavit of Merit must only contain an expert’s sworn statement that medical negligence occurred, along with confirmation that he or she is qualified to proffer a medical opinion.”). [2] Considering the above, the Court finds that the affidavit of merit complies with 18 Del. C. § 6853(a) and (c) as to Defendants Janice E. Tildon-Burton, M.D and CCHS. IT IS SO ORDERED. Ml.%/ v Abl(§ail`l\'/[. LeGro€v, Judge Original to Prothonotary cc: Bradley J. Goewert, Esquire Thomas J. Marcoz, Jr., Esquire Richard Galperin, Esquire Joshua H. Meyeroff, Esquire Bartholomew J. Dalton, Esquire