United States v. Jasmine Hargrove

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jasmine Hargrove appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Muldrow, 844 F.3d 434, 437 (4th Cir. 2016) (reviewing district court’s decision whether to reduce sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED