IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
NEVADA EX REL. JOHN FRANCIS No, 77633 ARPINO, Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILE COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JAN 3 1 2019 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ELI A. BROWN CLE OF PREA .COU WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE BARRY L. BRESLOW", DISTRICT DEPUTY CLERK
JUDGE, Respondents.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
This original pro se petition for a writ of prohibition challenges a November 7, 2018, district court order denying petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis. 1 The application was denied after the district court reviewed, under a prior order restricting petitioner's court access, the petition that petitioner proposed to file in forma pauperis and determined that it was frivolous or brought for an improper purpose and did not implicate a fundamental right.
'Petitioner has filed documents seeking correction of the caption and file-stamped copies of his petition and attachments. Although the State does not appear to bear an interest in this matter, neither any statute nor any court rule requires writ petitions to be captioned in the name of the State, and it is no longer "the universal rule of practice" to caption petitions such, we direct the clerk of this court to modify this docket's caption to reflect the caption on the petition and on this order. Cf. State v. District Court, 51 Nev. 206, 273 P. 659, 660 (1929); State v. Curler, 26 Nev. 347, 67 P. 1075, 1076 (1902), 55 C.J.S. Mandamus § 339 (2015); 72A C.J.S. Prohibition § 10 (2015). The clerk of this court shall also mail petitioner a file-stamped copy of his petition and attachments. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 19-0q9b9
Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844(2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991); see Jordan v. State ex rel. Dep't of Motor Vehicles & Pub. Safety, 121 Nev. 44, 110 P.3d 30 (2005) (distinguishing between pre-service review of complaints and orders restricting court access), abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008); Arpino v. Washoe Cty. Bd. of Comm'rs, Docket Nos. 70429-COA & 70494-COA (January 30, 2017, Order of Affirmance). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
cc: Hon. Barry L. Breslow, District Judge John Francis Arpino Attorney General/Carson City Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ec, 2