AKHNATEN CASEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT AKHNATEN CASEY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4328 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed May 22, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, Judge. Akhnaten Casey, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Mendenhall v. State, 48 So. 3d 740 (Fla. 2010); Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Flowers v. State, 69 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Coke v. State, 955 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Lykins v. State, 894 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Thomas v. State, 778 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and SALARIO,JJ., Concur.