United States v. Michael Wilkinson

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-3496 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Michael Wilkinson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison ____________

Submitted: August 5, 2019 Filed: August 8, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Wilkinson pleaded guilty to making threats against a federal officer’s family in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(A), and the district court1 sentenced him

1 The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

to time served (eight months and one day) and two years of supervised release. Wilkinson appeals, and his counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the factual basis supporting the plea and the lack of an inquiry into Wilkinson’s medical condition to assess the voluntariness of the plea.

Because Wilkinson did not raise these arguments below, we review for plain error. See United States v. Christenson, 653 F.3d 697, 700 (8th Cir. 2011). Having reviewed the evidence before the district court, including the government’s recitation of the facts it could prove and Wilkinson’s admissions, we conclude that there was an adequate factual basis for the guilty plea, see United States v. Frook, 616 F.3d 773, 776-77 (8th Cir. 2010), and that there was no indication during the plea colloquy that Wilkinson’s medical condition played any role in his decision to plead guilty. We also conclude that Wilkinson’s pro se arguments involving matters related to the detention hearing are moot. See United States v. Askia, 893 F.3d 1110, 1122 (8th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 2019 WL 2059745 (U.S. June 10, 2019).

After independently reviewing the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________

-2-