ARMANDO B. HIDALGO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ARMANDO B. HIDALGO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-399 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 18, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County; Don T. Hall, Judge. Armando B. Hidalgo, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Drawdy, 136 So. 3d 1209 (Fla. 2014); State v. Meshell, 2 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2009); Melvin v. State, 645 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1994); Lindquist v. State, 155 So. 3d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Carlyle v. State, 945 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Vidak v. State, 793 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Haynes v. State, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); Schwenn v. State, 898 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.