Trina Ray v. County of Los Angeles

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TRINA RAY, individually, and on No. 17-56581 behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-04239- v. PA-SK

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellant.

TRINA RAY; SASHA WALKER, No. 18-55276 individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:17-cv-04239- PA-SK v.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT ORDER OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES, Erroneously Sued As County of Los Angeles, Defendant-Appellee.

Filed October 8, 2019 2 RAY V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges, and Kathleen Cardone, * District Judge.

Order

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 22, 2019 is amended as follows:

On page six of the opinion, in the paragraph beginning “As employers of the homecare providers,” replace <As employers of the homecare providers, the State and County> with <Assuming, without deciding, the State and County are employers of the homecare providers, they>.

With this amendment, the panel votes to deny the appellant’s petition for panel rehearing. [Dkt. 51] Judges Wardlaw and Bennett vote to deny the appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc [DKT No. 51], and Judge Cardone so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is therefore DENIED. No further petitions for panel or en banc rehearing shall be permitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

* The Honorable Kathleen Cardone, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation.