Full text
Affinity Gaming Vs. Dist. Ct. (Huffman)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
AFFINITY GAMING, A NEVADA No. 79742 CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 'V 1 5 2.'319 ELIZABETH GOFF GONZALEZ, 7 DISTRICT JUDGE, CLER zi: 1:• :am Respondents, BY BPUIY CIL and AARON HUFFMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges the district court's denial of a motion to dismiss. Having considered the petition and appendices filed in this matter, we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Halverson v. Miller, 124 Nev. 484, 487, 186 P.3d 893, 896 (2008) (recognizing that the decision to issue a writ of mandamus or prohibition "is solely within this court's discretion" and
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 101C1 COI 1947A
1111E111111Eli
that petitioner bears the burden to establish that such extraordinary relief is appropriate). We therefore ORDER the petition DENIED.'
, C.J. Gibbog
J. Silver
, Sr. J. Douglas
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge McDonald Carano LLP/Reno McDonald Carano LLP/Las Vegas McGuirewoods LLP O'Mara Law Firm, P.C. Scott D. Owens, P.A. Eighth District Court Clerk
'The Honorable Michael Douglas, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 947A