Brian Hutchcroft-Darling v. Jerry Vander Sanden

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 20-2312 ___________________________

Brian Hutchcroft-Darling

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Justin Boecker

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Jerry A. Vander Sanden

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

City of Cedar Rapids

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Linn County, Iowa

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________

Submitted: March 11, 2021 Filed: March 17, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Brian Hutchcroft-Darling appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of partial summary judgment in his civil rights action. Although the parties have not raised the issue, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. See Huggins v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., 566 F.3d 771, 773 (8th Cir. 2009) (stating that where it appears jurisdiction is lacking, appellate courts are obligated to consider sua sponte jurisdictional issues). Specifically, there is no final judgment because Hutchcroft-Darling has claims still pending in the district court, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (stating that courts of appeals have jurisdiction of appeals from final decisions); Thomas v. Basham, 931 F.2d 521, 523 (8th Cir. 1991) (stating that an appeal was premature when some claims remained pending), and none of the exceptions to the final-judgment rule apply, see Huggins, 566 F.3d at 775 (interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)); Krein v. Norris, 250 F.3d 1184, 1187 (8th Cir. 2001) (collateral-order doctrine); Thomas, 931 F.2d at 523 (Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) certification). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as premature. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.

-2-