Petra Ugarte v. Eureka Holdings Acquisitions, LP, and 2019 FOREAL, LP

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00083-CV

Petra Ugarte, Appellant

v.

Eureka Holdings Acquisitions, LP, and 2019 FOREAL, LP, Appellees

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CV-19-008503, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petra Ugarte appeals the county court at law’s final judgment rendered in appellees’ suit for forcible detainer awarding appellees possession of the premises at issue. However, the legislature has limited this Court’s jurisdiction in appeals from such proceedings by enacting Section 24.007 of the Property Code: “A final judgment of a county court in an eviction suit may not be appealed on the issue of possession unless the premises in question are being used for residential purposes only.” Tex. Prop. Code § 24.007; Volume Millwork, Inc. v. West Hous. Airport Corp., 218 S.W.3d 722, 726–27 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, pet. denied); Carlson’s Hill Country Beverage, L.C. v. Westinghouse Rd. Joint Venture, 957 S.W.2d 951, 952–53 (Tex. App.—Austin 1997, no pet.). The county court at law did not make a finding that the premises are being used for residential purposes only, nor does the record evidence support such a finding; rather, the evidence demonstrates that the premises are being used, at least in part, for commercial purposes. Furthermore, this Court has provided Ugarte with notice *2 that her suit may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless she can demonstrate that this Court has jurisdiction over her appeal under Section 24.007, but Ugarte has not so demonstrated.

We, accordingly, dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We additionally lift our temporary stay of the trial court’s issuance of writ of possession.

__________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Kelly Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: May 21, 2021