Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.

Per Curiam. This is the third time that this case has been before the court, and an investigation of the record convinces us that all the controlling questions now involved have been passed upon in the prior decisions rendered. 18 Wash. 524 (52 Pac. 235) ; 20 Wash. 450 (55 Pac. 756). In addition, with our view of the law governing this case and the testimony introduced, there seems to be no defense to the action, either equitable or legal. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.