Loading…

Tait v. Hofius — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Tait v. Hofius

38 Wash. 699 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1905

Full text

Hugh A. Tait, as Receiver of the Bay Lumber & Shingle Company v. W. D. Hofius

Per Curiam. For the reasons assigned in Tait v. Pigott, ante p. 59, 80 Pac. 172 (just decided), the judgment in this case will be affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 4919936

Citations

38 Wash. 699
1905 Wash. LEXIS 1235
80 P. 173

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service