Loading…

Di Lauro v. Camil — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Di Lauro v. Camil

145 So. 2d 532 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 16, 1962

Full text

Anne DI LAURO v. Dorothy V. CAMIL

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Barrs v. State, 91 Fla. 30, 107 So. 249; Blackwelder v. D’Ercole Enterprises, Inc., Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 598.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Barkdull, Carroll, Pearson, Tillman
Cluster ID: 4973090

Citations

145 So. 2d 532

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service