Full text
Frank H. MAHR v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Inc.
Opinions in this case
- Majority
- Dissent — Ervin
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
THOMAS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS and ERVIN, JJ., dissent.