Full text
Jason BUDNICK, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leonard Budnick v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
POLEN, J.
We affirm the final judgment because we find that the appellant’s general objec
[939] tion to bifurcation was not sufficient to preserve the perceived error that certain evidence should be allowed into evidence during Phase I of the proceedings. See Noel v. Broward Gen. Med. Ctr., 725 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Corona v. State, 64 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982); Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493 (Fla.1992).
Affirmed.
STEVENSON, J., and BONAVITA, AUGUST, Associate Judge, concur.