Loading…

Lane v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Lane v. State

104 So. 3d 874 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 7, 2012

Full text

Ex parte Bobby Rogers LANE. (In re Bobby Rogers Lane v. State of Alabama)

Opinions in this case

Majority — Shaw
Dissent — Malone

SHAW, Justice. WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION. WOODALL, STUART, BOLIN, PARKER, MURDOCK, MAIN, and WISE, JJ., concur. MALONE, C.J., dissents.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Shaw
Judges: Bolin, Main, Malone, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise, Woodall
Cluster ID: 4987836

Citations

104 So. 3d 874
2012 WL 3871488

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service