Loading…

Rolling v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Rolling v. State

2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4452 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 13, 2009

Full text

Donald Keith ROLLING v. The STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Chanquet v. State, 646 So.2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Cortinas, Gersten, Salter
Cluster ID: 4989720

Citations

2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4452
11 So. 3d 420
2009 WL 1311019

Cited by

Donald Keith Rolling v. the State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 6, 2024

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service