Loading…

Taylor v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Taylor v. State

2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18886 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 27, 2013

Full text

Michael Markel TAYLOR v. STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Mackey v. State, 124 So.3d 176 (Fla.2013). WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Conner, Forst, Warner
Cluster ID: 4996391

Citations

2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18886
127 So. 3d 837
2013 WL 6182377

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service