Loading…

Noble v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Noble v. State

2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7115 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 14, 2014

Full text

Rashod NOBLE v. STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ruger v. State, 941 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). MAY, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Ciklin, Klingensmith
Cluster ID: 5000000

Citations

2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7115
138 So. 3d 1128
2014 WL 1908780

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service