Loading…

Rudnick v. Harman — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Rudnick v. Harman

162 So. 3d 116 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 30, 2014

Full text

Bryan G. RUDNICK v. Allyson HARMAN f/k/a Allyson Harman Rudnick

Opinions in this case

Majority
On rehearing — Stevenson

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. DAMOORGIAN, C.J., STEVENSON, J., and GILLESPIE, KENNETH, Associate Judge, concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Damoorgian, Gillespie, Kenneth, Stevenson
Cluster ID: 5006745

Citations

162 So. 3d 116
2015 WL 340721

Cited by

FRANK LEYTE-VIDAL v. VERONICA LEYTE-VIDAL
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 26, 2022
Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Shirer v. Shirer
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 17, 2016

Parentheticals

observing “that the extraordinary elevation in Former Husband’s 2012 income was not regular and continuous, but was instead due to a specific non-recurring event”
Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Shirer v. Shirer

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service