McKinnon v. Pelt

PER CURIAM. We affirm the order denying Appellant’s motion to dissolve the injunction, without prejudice to the appellant’s ability to file a subsequent motion asserting the requisite changed circumstances and seeking a hearing thereon. See Reyes v. Reyes, 104 So.3d 1206 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); Alkhoury v. Alkhoury, 54 So.3d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Knight v. Waters, 786 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). BENTON, LEWIS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.