Opinion

State v. J.V.

2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2117 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 16, 2016

Full text

STATE of Florida v. J.V., a minor

PER CURIAM. As the order on appeal had two grounds for releasing J.V. from his commitment prior to the Department of Juvenile Justice discharging him, and as the State’s initial brief only challenges the first ground — the trial court’s statutory interpretation, we are compelled to affirm since reversal can only be premised on arguments made in the initial brief. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Hill, 198 So.2d 365 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); Page v. City of Fernandina Beach, 714 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) AFFIRMED. LEWIS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Bilbrey, Lewis, Rowe
Cluster ID: 5012672

Citations

2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2117
184 So. 3d 662
2016 WL 606767

Cited by

DASMOND BRANNON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 26, 2024
Michael and Sara Willens v. Joel Willens and Linda Willens
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 20, 2017

Parentheticals

“As the order, on appeal had two grounds ..., and as the State’s initial brief only challenges the first ground -..., we are compelled to affirm since reversal can only be premised on arguments made in the initial brief.”
Michael and Sara Willens v. Joel Willens and Linda Willens
“As the order on appeal had two grounds . . . , and as the State’s initial brief only challenges the first ground . . . , we are compelled to affirm since reversal can only be premised on arguments made in the initial brief.”
Michael and Sara Willens v. Joel Willens and Linda Willens
“As the order on appeal had two grounds . . . , and as the State’s initial brief only challenges the first ground . . . , we are compelled to affirm since reversal can only be premised on arguments made in the initial brief.”
DASMOND BRANNON v. STATE OF FLORIDA