Bart v. Swezy

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See. Mullins v. Mullins, 799 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (observing that temporary relief awards “are among the areas where trial judges have the very broadest discretion, which appellate .courts are very reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of circumstances”) (quoting Pedraja v. Garcia, 667 So.2d 461, 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)); Schmitz v. Schmitz, 891 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). CIKLIN, C.J., GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.