Loading…

Criollo v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Criollo v. State

2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14258 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 23, 2016

Full text

Victor Manuel CRIOLLO v. STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Rowe v. State, 777 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). KELLY, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur,

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Black, Kelly, Salario
Cluster ID: 5016357

Citations

2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14258
201 So. 3d 751

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service