Loading…

Collier v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Collier v. State

2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3445 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 15, 2017

Full text

Taj COLLIER v. STATE of Florida

Per Curiam. Affirmed. See Kuehl v. Bradshaw, 954 So.2d 653, 655 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Ciklin, C.J., Warner and Gross, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Ciklin, Gross, Warner
Cluster ID: 5023375

Citations

2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3445
214 So. 3d 686
2017 WL 1013180

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service