Barde v. State

Per Curiam. Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant’s timely filing a rule 3.850 motion alleging, if appropriate, that he does not qualify for sentencing as a habitual felony offender and/or as a prison release reoffen-der. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2001); Hampton v. State, 941 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Affirmed. May, Damoorgian and Levine, JJ., concur.