Kopanon v. State

PER CURIAM. We affirm Nicklos Michael Kopanon’s judgment and sentence. However, we remand this matter with instructions for the trial court to identify which terms of probation Kopanon violated, and to correct a scrivener’s error that incorrectly states that Kopanon admitted to violating his probation. See Patt v. State, 876 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Brinson v. State, 866 So.2d 1268, 1269 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions. SAWAYA, PALMER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.