Williams v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed, but for reasons different from those provided by the state below; the ground for relief is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Anderson v. State, 758 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Chanquet v. State, 646 So.2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.