Richardson v. State

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of Richardson’s Rule 3.800(a)1 motion without prejudice to Richardson’s right to seek additional jail credit pursuant to a legally sufficient motion. See Alfonso v. State, 901 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). MONACO, C.J., EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur. Footnotes [1] Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).