Loading…

Faidengold v. Escorihuela — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Faidengold v. Escorihuela

2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1669 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 9, 2011

Full text

Moises FAIDENGOLD v. Diana ESCORIHUELA

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See LaRose v. A.K., 37 So.3d 265 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Gersten, Ramirez, Salter
Cluster ID: 5048453

Citations

2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1669
54 So. 3d 585
2011 WL 613522

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service