Loading…

S.P.M. v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

S.P.M. v. State

2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8898 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 15, 2011

Full text

S.P.M. v. STATE of Florida

Opinions in this case

Opinion — Per curiam
Majority
Concurrence — Casanueva

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. [318] VILLANTI and LaROSE, JJ., Concur. CASANUEVA, C.J., Concurs in result only with opinion.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Casanueva, Larose, Only, Villanti
Cluster ID: 5051967

Citations

2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8898
66 So. 3d 317
2011 WL 2341393

Cited by

Geovera Specialty Insurance v. Hutchins
M.D. Florida · Dec 21, 2011

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service