Loading…

Phillips v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Phillips v. State

37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 317 · Supreme Court of Florida · Apr 26, 2012

Full text

Harry Franklin PHILLIPS v. STATE of Florida

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Walton v. State, 77 So.3d 639 (FIa.2011). It is so ordered. CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince
Cluster ID: 5060040

Citations

37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 317
2012 Fla. LEXIS 819
91 So. 3d 783
2012 WL 1431892

Cited by

Harry Franklin Phillips v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida · May 21, 2020

Parentheticals

affirming denial of successive motion for postconviction relief based on the claim that Phillips’s sentence violates the Sixth and Eighth Amendments under Porter v. McCollum, 558 U.S. 30 (2009)
Harry Franklin Phillips v. State of Florida

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service