Full text
Bernestine HILL v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS INGERSOLL and Great Northern Insurance Co.), Appeal of BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL
Opinions in this case
- Majority — Per curiam
- Concurrence — Madamenewman
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2002, the Commonwealth Court’s order is vacated and the matter remanded for reconsideration in light of Vista Int’l Hotel v. WCAB (Daniels), 560 Pa. 12, 742 A.2d 649 (1999). See generally Montgomery Hosp. v. WCAB (Armstrong), 793 A.2d 182, 189 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002); Darrall v. WCAB (H.J. Heinz Co.), 792 A.2d 706, 712-13 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002); Martin v. WCAB (Red
[510] Rose Transit Auth), 783 A.2d 384, 391 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001).
Madame Justice NEWMAN files a concurring statement.