Loading…

Commonwealth v. Mudd — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mudd

589 Pa. 160 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2006

Full text

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. James Martin MUDD, III

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Baldwin

ORDER PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted. Justice BALDWIN files a Dissenting Statement.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Baldwin, Files
Cluster ID: 5142629

Citations

589 Pa. 160
2006 Pa. LEXIS 1997
907 A.2d 1048

Cited by

Com. v. Myers, N.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2016

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service