Loading…

L.A.M. v. C.R. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

L.A.M. v. C.R.

2012 Pa. Super. 45 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 2012

Full text

L.A.M. v. C.R.

Opinions in this case

Majority — Per curiam
Dissent — Donohue

PER CURIAM: Order affirmed. Judge DONOHUE files a dissenting opinion.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Donohue, Olson, Strassburger
Cluster ID: 5145155

Citations

2012 Pa. Super. 45
2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 51
42 A.3d 1063

Cited by

M.O. v. F.W.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2012

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service