Michelle BRAUN, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., A Delaware Corporation, and Sam's Club, An Operating Segment of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Petitioners Dolores Hummel, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., A Delaware Corporation, And Sam's Club, An Operating Segment of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of JULY, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue is:
Whether, in a purported class action tried to verdict, it violates Pennsylvania law (including the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure) to subject Wal-Mart to a “Trial by Formula” that relieves Plaintiffs of their burden to produce class-wide “common” evidence on key elements of their claims.
Further, Petitioners’ Applications for Leave to File Post-Alloeatur Communications and a Reply are DENIED as moot.
declining to render an advisory opinion on the merits of a 370% multiplier where trial court, which inadvertently double-counted factors in granting an enhancement, may not necessarily impose the same 3.7 multiplier on remand